Wednesday, April 18, 2007

THE EROSION OF CHOICE


John Roberts tells your uterus to talk to the hand


While the nation is distracted with a national tragedy, the Supreme Court has handed down a 5-4 opinion upholding a ban on the Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act.

This opinion won't affect most abortions performed in the United States. Nor does it eradicate a woman's right to choose.

But for women aborting a fetus as early as the twelfth week of pregnancy, the ban prevents them from undergoing what many respected medical groups -- namely, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists -- have suggested is the safest, and sometimes a necessary, procedure.

While the Court's opinion isn't a reversal of Roe v. Wade, it clearly signals a new direction. The Supreme Court has never before restricted how an abortion can be performed. Before the Court delivered its smackdown this morning, at least half a dozen federal courts had ruled that the ban was an unconstitutional restriction on a woman's constitutional right guaranteed by the last 33 years of reproductive freedom jurisprudence.

Most horrifying of all, the opinion undoubtedly gives Congress and the states the green light to slowly erode other abortion-related rights until there is no meaningful reproductive freedom.

In my nightmare scenario, so many procedures will be eliminated and so many hoops will be propped up (e.g., age restrictions, second-trimester bans, outlawing government-funded counseling that mentions abortion, spousal consent requirements, etc.) that the anti-choice movement will have rendered Roe v. Wade worthless without even having it overturned.

Note that the majority consists of: Kennedy, Roberts, Alito, Scalia, and Thomas. It's fair to assume that before Alito or Roberts were appointed, Justice O'Connor would have joined the dissent.

As I've said before, President Bush's longest-lasting legacy will be his appointment of Justice Alito and Chief Justice Roberts, give or take the lingering effects of a war on terror.


Resources/Links:
  • Gonzales v. Planned Parenthood and Gonzales v. Carhart slip opinions
  • Federal Abortion Ban Trials
  • Joshua Holland at Alternet

Labels: abortion, Supreme Court

--Junichi

Permalink | |

Who Runs This?

    Most Recent Comments

Previous Posts

  • WHAT IF WAR BROKE OUT OVER CONDOM ADS?
  • THE OTHER PRESIDENTIAL "RACE"
  • A LITTLE DEBATE
  • MILLION MOON MARCH
  • BROTHER IN BLENDER
  • ONE WAY OF RELIEVING STRESS
  • THE GREAT FIREWALL OF CHINA
  • SYNERGY
  • EQUALITY AT ANY COST?
  • FORGET LEBRON AND KING KONG, IT'S OBAMA'S TURN

Archives

    December 2004 | April 2005 | May 2005 | June 2005 | July 2005 | August 2005 | September 2005 | October 2005 | November 2005 | December 2005 | January 2006 | February 2006 | March 2006 | April 2006 | May 2006 | June 2006 | July 2006 | August 2006 | September 2006 | October 2006 | November 2006 | December 2006 | January 2007 | February 2007 | March 2007 | April 2007 | May 2007 | June 2007 | July 2007 | August 2007 | September 2007 | October 2007 | November 2007 | December 2007 | January 2008 | February 2008 | March 2008 | April 2008 | May 2008 | June 2008 | July 2008 |

Our Blog Rolls

  • Junichi's Links
  • Oliver's Links

    Poplicks Radio





  • Junichi's Best Songs of 2007 List
  • Junichi's Best Songs of 2006 List

Help Junichi Lose Weight

  • ... and raise money for charity

 Subscribe to Poplicks.


Weblog Commenting by HaloScan.com